Cookie Consent
Hi, this website uses essential cookies to ensure its proper operation and tracking cookies to understand how you interact with it. The latter will be set only after consent.
Accept allDenySettings
Read our Privacy Policy
Back
Navigating AI Governance: EU AI Act vs. White House's AI Bill of Rights
GOVERNANCE, EU AI ACT, U.S. AI BILL OF RIGHTS

Get Free Content

Learn about the EU and U.S. AI regulations.

Overview

Explore AI security with the Lakera LLM Security Playbook. This guide is a valuable resource for everyone looking to understand the risks associated with AI technologies.

Ideal for professionals, security enthusiasts, or those curious about AI, the playbook offers insight into the challenges and solutions in AI security.

Highlights

  • Comprehensive Analysis of LLM Vulnerabilities: Detailed overview of critical security risks in LLM applications.
  • Gandalf - The AI Education Game: Introduction to Gandalf, an online game designed for learning about AI security.
  • Expansive Attack Database: Insights from a database of nearly 30 million LLM attack data points, updated regularly.
  • Lakera Guard - Security Solution: Information about Lakera Guard, developed to counteract common AI threats.‍
  • Practical Security Advice: Tips on data sanitization, PII detection, and keeping up-to-date with AI security developments.

‍

Overview

The EU AI Act and the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights by the White House represent two major legislative approaches to AI regulation, each with its unique focus and scope.

Highlights

  • The EU AI Act: a comprehensive legal framework proposed by the European Commission to regulate the use of AI across all sectors except the military.
  • Categories of AI risk in the EU AI Act: unacceptable risk, high risk, limited risk, minimal risk.
  • The White House's AI Bill of Rights: not a binding legal document but rather a set of principles aimed at guiding the ethical use of AI and automated systems.
  • Key elements of the Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights: safe and effective systems, algorithmic discrimination protestions, data privacy, notice and explanation, human alternatives, consideration, and feedback.

‍